CMR-Analysis (including machine learning)
Chi Zhang
PhD Candidate
University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United States
Chi Zhang
PhD Candidate
University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United States
Omer B. Demirel, MSc
PhD Candidate
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Burhaneddin Yaman, BSc
PhD
University of Minnesota
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Hossam El-Rewaidy
MSc.
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Chetan Shenoy, MBBS, MS
Associate Professor of Medicine
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Reza Nezafat, PhD
Professor
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Mehmet Akcakaya, PhD
Associate Professor
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Improved Self-Supervised Deep Learning Reconstruction: Regularized MRI reconstruction solves minx ||yΩ-EΩx||2 + R(x), where EΩ is the multi-coil encoding operator for sampling pattern Ω, yΩ is the acquired k-space, x is the image and R(·) is a regularizer. PG-DL is implemented using algorithm unrolling [2], alternating between data fidelity and a CNN-based R(·). Building on the self-supervision strategy [2], we propose a sharpening loss term L(HyΛ, HEΛ(f(yΘ, EΘ; θ))) in addition to the loss function in [2] (Fig. 1), where H denotes a sharpening filter, Λ and Θ are disjoint sub-sets of Ω, L(·) is the l1-l2 loss in [2], and (y, E; θ) denotes output of the network with parameters θ. LGE Data and Training: 3D LGE was acquired axially at 1.5T using 32-channel coil array with imaging parameters: resolution=1.2×1.2×1.2 mm3, FOV=320×320×100 mm3, ACS =40×24, R=3 acceleration. The data was divided into smaller 20×270×102 sub-volumes by taking IFFT in kx direction [2]. PG-DL training was performed on 198 slabs from 10 subjects. Conventional normalized l1-l2 loss, along with proposed sharpening loss were utilized. The data was further retrospectively subsampled to R=6 by keeping a 24×24 ACS region representing higher acceleration. Testing was performed on 6 new subjects. Fig. 2 shows representative results. Both PG-DL strategies successfully reconstruct the R = 6 image. PG-DL with sharpening loss demonstrates improved recovery of fine-details, matching the R = 3 reconstruction. The proposed sharpening loss improves the recovery of fine-details of self-supervised PG-DL, especially in relatively high acceleration rates for high-resolution LGE.
Results:
Conclusion: