Tissue Characterization
Andréa Coy-Canguçu
BSc Student
Catholic Pontifical University of Campinas
Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Layde Paim
Post-Doctoral Student
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Luis Miguel Da Silva
Doctoral Student
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Lígia Antunes-Correa
Assistant Professor
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Vinicius Ribeiro
Researcher
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Roberto Schreiber
Researcher
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Eduarda Minin
Student
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Larissa Bueno
Researcher
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Elisangela Lopes
Researcher
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Renan Yamaguti
BSc Student
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Sergio Dertkigil
Researcher
State University of Campinas, Brazil
Andrei Sposito
Full Professor
University of Campinas, Brazil
José Roberto Mattos-Souza, MD, PhD
Researcher
State University of Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Tomas G. Neilan, MD
Director, Cardio-Oncology Program
Massachusetts General Hospital
Newton, Massachusetts, United States
Wilson Nadruz, Jr., MD, PhD
Associate Professor
State University of Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Michael Jerosch-Herold, PhD
Associate Professor
Harvard Medical School, United States
Otavio Coelho-Filho, MD, PhD, MPH
Associate Professor
University of Campinas - UNICAMP
Campinas, Brazil
Of the 188 miRNAs found in both HF phenotypes, 13 were differentially expressed between HFpEF and HFrEF patients, with 11 of them downregulated in HFpEF (Fig 1). Although late gadolinium enhancement was more frequent in HFrEF (71.0%) than in HFpEF (47.1%, p=0.03), myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) was similarly increased in both HF groups compared to controls (HFpEF 30±5%; HFrEF 30±3; controls 26±2, p< 0.001, Fig 2). While LV mass index was increased in both HF groups (HFpEF 68.7±25.7 g/m2; HFrEF 85.6±40.6; controls 41.8±8.1, p< 0.001), the intracellular water lifetime (τic), a marker of cardiomyocyte diameter, was elevated in HFpEF (HFpEF 0.15±0.05 s; HFrEF 0.11±0.04, p=0.01). Correlation analysis showed that miR-128-a-3p, which when upregulated has been linked to cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and LV function impairment, correlated with ECV in both HF groups, but following distinct patterns (HFrEF R=-0.51, p=0.04; HFpEF R=0.60, p=0.01) (Fig 3). miR-423-5p overexpression, previously associated with increased mortality in HF, was inversely associated with LVEF (R=-0.29, p=0.04) and ic (R=-0.45, p< 0.05) in both HF groups, and with NT-proBNP in the HFpEF group (τic R=-0.49, p=0.02; NT-proBNP R=-0.63, p=0.001). Both miRNAs were downregulated in HFpEF compared to HFrEF.
Conclusion:
MiRNA expression profiles differed significantly between HFpEF and HFrEF patients, indicating that: [1] the overexpression of miR-423-5p in the HFrEF group was associated with LV dysfunction, hypertrophy, and eccentric remodeling by greater τic and NT-proBNP values; and [2] underexpression of miR-128-a-3p in the HFpEF group was associated with diffuse myocardial fibrosis by increased ECV. The positive association between miR-128-a-3p and ECV among HFpEF patients indicates that this pathway plays a role in the progression of myocardial remodeling in this HF phenotype, in contrast to a negative association in HFrEF patients. The differential expression of miR-128-a-3p in HF subtypes and the differential association of miR-128-a-3p with ECV may reflect the distinct vascular, interstitial, and cellular etiologies of HFrEF and HFpEF.