Multiparametric Mapping
Kelvin Chow, PhD
Staff Scientist
Siemens Healthineers
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Kelvin Chow, PhD
Staff Scientist
Siemens Healthineers
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Lauren Pearce
Student
Stephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Chiara Coletti, MSc
PhD student
TU Delft
Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Jacqueline Flewitt, MSc
Research Collaborations Coordinator
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Andrew G. Howarth, MD, PhD
Clinical Co-director
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Carmen P. Lydell, MD
Clinical Co-director
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
James White, MD
Professor of Cardiology
Stephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Sebastian Weingartner, PhD
Assistant Professor
Delft University of Technology
Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Quantitative myocardial mapping is commonly used to characterize tissue microstructure and native T1 and T2 have been associated with fibrosis and edema. T1ρ has been proposed to be sensitive to collagen, enabling non-contrast detection of myocardial scar (1). Recent adiabatic T1ρ preparations have improved upon the previous sensitivity of conventional T1ρ spin-lock pulses to B0 and B1 inhomogeneity (2). The optimal T1ρ pulse design parameters, performance, and normative values at 3T have yet to be established.
Multi-parametric sequences are ideal for comprehensive tissue characterization due to the reduction in acquisition time and intrinsic co-registration of maps. Multi-parametric saturation-recovery single-shot acquisition (mSASHA) can be used for simultaneous T1, T2, and T1ρ mapping in a single breath-hold (3, 4). Conventional spin-lock and various adiabatic T1ρ preparations are evaluated on healthy volunteers scanned at both 1.5T and 3T.
Methods:
The mSASHA sequence consists of a single non-prepared (anchor), 6 T1-weighted, 2 T1+T2-weighted, and 2 T1+T1ρ-weighted images acquired in a 15-heartbeat breath-hold (Fig. 1). High-contrast images were used to improve motion correction and T1, T2, and T1ρ maps were calculated jointly from all images. T1ρ preparation was achieved using a pair of positive/negative frequency swept hyperbolic secant pulses with fmax=1600-1650 Hz and β=3.5, 5.0 and 7.0 (2). Reference spin-lock T1ρ preparation was also used with ω=400 Hz. All T1ρ durations (TSL) were 60 ms.
Five healthy volunteers (41±1 yrs, 4 female) were imaged at both 1.5T and 3T (MAGNETOM Aera and Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) on the same day. Mean and standard deviations over the left ventricular myocardium were calculated for each map.
Results:
mSASHA parametric maps visually had good image quality (Fig. 2), with T1 and T2 values in agreement with previously published T1/T2-only mSASHA (Table 1) (2). T1ρ with β=7.0 and conventional spin-lock exceeded energy limits in 1 subject each and these data were excluded. Adiabatic T1ρ values were higher than spin-lock T1ρ with a strong dependence on β from 3.5 to 7.0 at both 1.5T and 3T (46% and 56% increase respectively). No visible B0 dependence of T1ρ maps were observed at 1.5T, but spin-lock T1ρ had significant artifacts in 2 subjects at 3T coincident with significant B0 deviations (Fig. 2). MOLLI T1 values were also decreased in the off-resonance region while all mSASHA maps were unaffected. Precision (Table 1) was improved for all parameters at 3T compared to 1.5T and similar to T1/T2-only mSASHA (3).
Conclusion:
mSASHA provides comprehensive T1, T2, and T1ρ characterization in a single breath-hold with improved precision at 3T compared to 1.5T. Adiabatic T1ρ preparation improved robustness to B0 inhomogeneity, enabling imaging at 3T. Further clinical studies are required to determine the added value of T1ρ in various cardiomyopathies and the optimal adiabatic pulse parameters for detection of myocardial scar.