Motion Compensation
Dima Saied Bishara
PhD student
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Dima Saied Bishara
PhD student
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, United States
KyungPyo Hong, PhD
Research Associate
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Suvai Gunasekaran, PhD
Postdoctoral Researcher
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Mark Markl, PhD
Professor
Northwestern University
Daniel C. Lee, MD
Associate Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) and Radiology
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Bradley D. Allen, MD, MSc, FSCMR
Assistant Professor, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rod Passman, MD
Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) and Preventive Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Dan Kim, MD, MS
Cardiology Fellow
Loyola University Medical Center
Streamwood, Illinois, United States
This is a retrospective study using existing stack-of-stars raw k-space of 17 patients (3 females; mean age = 63.88 yrs) with atrial fibrillation. For details on imaging parameters, please see reference [2]. XD-GRASP reconstruction was performed on a GPU (2 x 32GB Tesla V100) computer using MATLAB.
Contrast adjusting and sharpening: As shown in Figure 1, to enhance the edge profiles of 1D SI projection signal, we performed contrast adjusting (‘imadjust’) for each coil image, then we sharpened the image using the unsharp masking method in MATLAB (‘imsharpen’).
PCA and Promax [4]: We then performed an orthogonal rotation (Promax) on the fully stacked coils data, and conventional PCA for comparison. We computed the blur metric (0 [best] to 1 [worst]) [5] on a cropped image encapsulating the heart region only. The variable normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Paired t-test was used to compare the mean blur metric values.
Results:
Motion correction: As shown in Figure 1, a combination of image contrast adjustment, sharpening, and EFA produced the best respiratory signal extraction compared with other combinations. As shown in Figure 2, EFA with preprocessing produced better results than PCA (see both zero-filled NUFFT images).
Blur Metric: According to the Shapiro-Wilk test, the blur metric is normally distributed. The mean blur metric was significantly (p< 0.001) better for EFA (0.38 ± 0.04) than PCA (0.41 ± 0.05), where the relative difference was 7%.
Conclusion: This study shows that EFA extracts better self-navigation signal than PCA for XD-GRASP reconstruction. Future study includes comparison of repeatability of LA fibrosis quantification between PCA and EFA self-navigation signal extraction. Another study includes comparing PCA and EFA on other types of XD-GRASP data.