Caries
Mary M. Pearman, DDS
Pediatric Dental Resident
Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Newport, Kentucky, United States
Jennifer L. Cully, DMD, MEd
Associate Professor
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Sarat Thikkurissy, DDS, DDS, MS
Division Director/Research Mentor
Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center (Cincinnati, OH)
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Giulia Castrigano, DDS, MS
Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
Jennifer L. Cully, DMD, MEd
Associate Professor
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Annmarie Matusak, DDS, DDS
Program Director
Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center (Cincinnati, OH)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Purpose: To determine whether silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is an effective treatment for primary maxillary incisors as determined by the need for additional restorative treatment post-SDF application and to identify potential factors that may increase the likelihood of SDF success. Methods: A chart review was completed for patients who had SDF applied to primary maxillary incisors over 3.5 years. Variables included teeth and tooth surfaces to which SDF was applied, age at initial and subsequent applications, number of applications, time between applications, behavior, use of fluoride varnish, symptoms at initial application, and additional treatment required, including composite resins, crowns, extractions, or sedative fillings and use of sedation or general anesthesia. Descriptive statistics were completed. Results: Data were collected from 141 subjects with 794 applications of SDF to primary maxillary incisors. Forty-seven percent (47%) of teeth treated with two SDF applications required additional treatment, compared to 41% of teeth treated with more than two SDF applications. There was no significant association between number of SDF applications and need for additional treatment (P=.32). However, SDF applied twice and to more than one surface, was significantly associated with need for additional treatment (P < .0001). There was no statistical difference in future treatment whether fluoride varnish was concomitantly applied with SDF (P=0.32). Conclusions: SDF is an effective treatment for primary maxillary incisors; however, it is less effective in treating teeth with multiple carious surfaces. Additional SDF treatments and fluoride varnish application following SDF placement did not improve the likelihood of additional treatment needed.