110 Views
Monday Poster Session
Category: IBD
Jeffery M. Venner, MD, MSc
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Table 1A. Transcript set correlation with Endoscopic Mayo Score (0-3) in ulcerative colitis biopsies (N=128) | ||||
Transcript Set | Spearman correlation coefficient | P-value | ||
Colon-associated – solute carriers (CT2, parenchymal function) | -0.60 | 6.5x10-14 | ||
Injury-repair-associated (IRRAT) | 0.64 | 4.7x10-16 | ||
Endothelial-associated (ENDAT) | 0.61 | 1.8x10-14 | ||
Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) | 0.57 | 2.5x10-12 | ||
Alternative Macrophage Activation-associated (AMAT) | 0.50 | 2.7x10-9 | ||
Macrophage-associated (QCMAT) | 0.58 | 8.9x10-13 | ||
Immunoglobulins (IGT) | 0.63 | 3.0x10-15 | ||
T cell-associated (QCAT) | 0.40 | 3.2x10-6 | ||
IFNG-inducible (GRIT) | 0.48 | 8.4x10-9 | ||
Table 1B. Mean transcript set scores (expression) and mean clinical scores/counts in each of the three Archetype Groups. | ||||
Variable | Group 1Grey – Normal (N=44 biopsies) | Group 2 Red – Injury 1 (N=44 biopsies) | Group 3Blue – Injury 2 (N=40 biopsies) | |
Clinical Features (#) | Mayo 0 biopsies (#) | 15 | 0 | 9 |
Mayo 1 biopsies (#) | 13 | 3 | 14 | |
Mayo 2 biopsies (#) | 14 | 18 | 13 | |
Mayo 3 biopsies (#) | 2 | 23 | 4 | |
Mean Clinical Features (median) | Mean endoscopic Mayo Score (median) | 1.07 (1.0) | 2.45 (3.0) | 1.3 (1.0) |
Mean total Mayo Score (median) | 3.2 (2.0) | 7.2 (7.0) | 4.4 (3.5) | |
Molecular Features (Transcript Set Score Expression Means) | Colon-associated – solute carriers (CT2, parenchymal function) | 0.04 | -0.53 | -0.15 |
Injury-repair-associated (IRRAT) | -0.14 | 0.80 | 0.34 | |
Endothelial-associated (ENDAT) | -0.03 | 0.49 | 0.17 | |
Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.38 | |
Alternative Macrophage Activation-associated (AMAT) | -0.12 | 0.60 | 0.22 | |
Macrophage-associated (QCMAT) | -0.05 | 0.64 | 0.21 | |
Immunoglobulins (IGT) | 0.05 | 1.21 | 0.31 | |
T cell-associated (QCAT) | 0.02 | 0.67 | 0.37 | |
IFNG-inducible (GRIT) | 0.15 | 0.65 | 0.34 | |
*Note. Groups 2 vs 1 and 2 vs 3 differed in total Mayo score (P=7.5E-6 and 0.001, respectively), and in endoscopic Mayo Score (P=4.1E-12, and 9.2E-9). Groups 3 vs 1 were not significantly different in Total Mayo Score (P=0.2) or Endoscopic Mayo Score (P=0.25). |