P2124 - Effectiveness of Gemcitabine Plus S-1 Combination as First-Line Therapy Tested in Japanese Population for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
Loyala Medicine/MacNeal Hospital Berwyn, IL, United States
Faiza Ahmed, MD, MS, BSc1, Ujala Nasr, MD2, Ammu Susheela, MD3, Faiza Zakaria, MD2, Sundus Ali, MD4, Alaa Hamdan, MD1, Anusha Sajja, MD1, Kim Andrews, MD, PhD, MHA5, Sai Harsha Bobba, MD6, Shanthi Potla, MD7, Aysha Aslam, MD8, Marc-Darlene Mezidor, MD9, Zeynep Yukselen, MD1, Karthik Mohan, DO1, Raza Zarrar, MD10, Endrit Shahini, MSc, MD11, Thiruvengadam Muniraj, MD, PhD, MRCP12 1Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, FL; 2Dow Medical College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan; 3Loyala Medicine/MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, IL; 4Ascension St. Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, MD; 5Prince Mohammad Bin Fahad University, Al Khobar, Ar Riyad, Saudi Arabia; 6Swedish Hospital, Chicago, IL; 7Beckley ARH Hospital, Beckley, WV; 8Louis A Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL; 9AMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital, Evanston, IL; 10Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; 11National Institute of Research-Saverio De Bellis, Bari, Basilicata, Italy; 12Yale New Haven Health System-Yale Center for Pancreatitis, New Haven, CT
Introduction: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are uncommon but highly lethal cancers in most parts of the world but is a common cause of mortality in Asia. In Japan, BTC is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death, and the occurrence is about 10 for every 100,000 people. The standard of care first-line chemotherapy treatment recommended in Japan for patients with advanced BTC is the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC). In recent decade, trials have been conducted to evaluate gemcitabine and s-1 (GS) combination as the first-line chemotherapy. Here, we present the first systematic review of GS efficacy profile in advanced BTC patients.
Methods: A comprehensive search was performed using multiple databases from inception - April 2021 using the PICO framework and PRISMA guidelines.
Results: A total of six studies (n=217) met the inclusion criteria. All studies are phase II clinical trials that were performed in Japan. There were higher number of males than females enrolled in each trial (sum=125 vs. 92). All trials achieved a median survival time (MST) of 15.9 mon(95% CI,8.9-23.0);vs. 9.0mon(95 %CI,4.0–13.9); vs 8.9mon; vs. 12.5mon(95% CI, 9.0–15.4); vs. 12.7mon(95% CI, 8.4–23.5); vs. 11.6mon (95% CI, 7.3–15.6) and a 1-year survival rate of 44.7 %(95 %CI 29.0–61.5); vs. 52.9%; vs. 52.0%(95% CI, 31.2–69.2%),p=0.02; vs. 44.4%, respectively. The location of primary tumor was classified as intrahepatic, extrahepatic, gallbladder, or ampulla of vater. Five studies reported partial response [5 (13.2%), 6, 6(20%), 7(30.4%), 10(29%)] , overall response rate [15.8%; (20.6% vs. 18.4%); 20%, 30.4%, 34.3%], overall disease control rate [(68.4%, (76.5% vs. 68.4%), 21(70%), 87%, 82.9%)], and stable disease [20(52.6%),19, 15 (50%), 13(56.5%), 17(49%)], respectively. Progressive disease data [(16(15.8%) vs. 8 vs. 8(26.7%)] was provided by Arima et al 2017 , Kim et al 2014, and Sasaki et al 2013. Median time-to-progression was similar in all reported trials [5.8 months (95% CI, 3.1-8.5); vs. 5.6 months; vs. 5.9 months(95% CI, 4.0–7.7)]. For additional information, refer to Table 1.
Discussion: The combination of GS chemotherapy exhibited promising antitumor activity for improving survival in Japanese patients with advanced BTC. Further comparative clinical trials between GS and GC are warranted to confirm the superiority of GS treatment in such patients. Additionally, large long-term clinical trials should be conducted in Western countries population to evaluate GS efficacy in gradually increasing BTC cases.
Arima et al 2017
Kim et al 2015
Sasaki et al 2013
Morizane et al 2013
Kanai et al 2011
Sasaki et al 2010
Country
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Japan
Treatment
Gemcitabine: IV, 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1, 8,
S-1: oral, 60/80/100 mg/day based on the BSA, twice daily, day1-14
(treatment repeated every 3 weeks)
Gemcitabine: IV, 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min, days 1, 8
S-1: oral, 40 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1–14
(treatment repeated every 3 weeks)
Gemcitabine: IV, 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1,15; repeated every 4 weeks.
S-1: oral, 40 mg/m2 b.i.d., twice daily, on days 1–14, followed by 2-week rest.
Gemcitabine: IV, 1000 mg⁄m2, day 1, 8
S-1: oral, 60 mg⁄m2, twice daily, days 1–14
(treatment repeated every 3 weeks)
Gemcitabine: IV, 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1, 8
S-1: oral, daily 60 mg/m2 on days 1–14.
(treatment repeated every 3 weeks)
Gemcitabine: IV, 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min on day 1,15; repeated every 4 weeks.
S-1: oral,40 mg/m2 b.i.d., twice daily, days 1–14, followed by 2-week rest.
Sample Size
38
38
62 (GS=30; Gem alone=32)
101 (GS=51;s-1 alone=50)
25
35
Male/Female (%)
19(50%) / 19(50%)
23(60.5%) / 15(39.5%)
16(53%) / 14(47%)
27 / 24
18(72%) / 7 (28%)
22(63%) /13(37%)
Median age (range)
66 (44-81)
60.5 (44-71)
68 (47-83)
66 (30-78)
63 ( 32-78)
67 (49-79)
ECOG performance status
0=31(82%); 1=6(16%); 2=1(2%)
0=23(60.5%); 1=15(39.5%)
0=18(60%); 1=11(37%); 2=1(3%); p=1.00
0=39 (76.5%); 1=12 (23.5%)
NA
0=16(46%); 1=18(51%); 2=1(3%)
Location of the primary tumor
Intrahepatic: 12(37%) Extrahepatic: 14(31%) Gallbladder: 9(24%) Ampulla of Vater: 3(8%)